Alan C. Olson & Associates, s.c.
WEBLOG

Home
Attorneys
Contact Us
Site Map


Prudential will now be confronted at trial with evidence of our client's disability

Prudential will now be confronted at trial with evidence of our client's disability
Posted by: Alan Olson
July 20, 2009

In a recent decision in favor of our client, the Court of Appeals remanded and instructed the district court that it "needs to know whether depression ever disabled [our client]. If the answer is no-either because his mental condition never was disabling, or because his physical impairments disabled him independent of his mental state-then the Plan's two-year bar does not apply, ruled the Court. If the answer is yes, and our client's mental condition played a causal role in his past inability to work, "it remains essential to know whether it remains important."

The Court reasoned that a trier of fact might conclude that, even if depression was a contributing cause of our client's past inability to work, any current inability to work has a physical rather than a mental cause. The policy does not say that, if two years of benefits have been provided on account of a mental condition, then no future benefits may be paid for a physical impairment: it says only that two years is the maximum period of benefits that may be justified, in whole or in part, by a mental condition. If the claimant's limitations today are "entirely physical (or if physical problems disable him no matter what his mental state), then benefits are available under this policy", the Court found.

The Court also identified a dispute about whether our client can work even with all of his physical and mental problems. Some physicians say yes, others no. The district court is required to make an independent decision. To do this, the Court held, the finder of fact must weigh all of the medical evidence. "Yet the district judge did not mention any of the evidence favoring the claimant (including the affidavits that should have been accepted). If a paper record contains a material dispute, a trial is essential. And at trial, we will now have the opportunity to offer our client's medical evidence and cross-examine the physicians who produced the reports that underlie Prudential's decision.

Once again, justice will prevail and a deserving person shall receive his long-term disability benefits.

Alan C Olson

 

 

 

 

 

Alan C. Olson practices disability law from his offices in New Berlin, Wisconsin, and throughout the United States. AOlson@GetMyLTDbenefits.com

Permalink

        

Topics

2010 Changes to Social Security Disability Earnings Limits
A disability insurance carrier's use of the same case manager to deny each internal appeal violates the claimant's right to a full and fair review.
Aetna and its army of doctors fail to block LTD benefit entitlement
Am I Covered?
Are my Social Security Benefits taxable?
Bad Faith Denial of Long-Term Disability Claim Warrants Award for Emotional Distress, Loss of Reputation, Economic Injury, Punitive Damages, and Attorney Fees
Children's Social Security Benefits offset by Long-Term Disability
Cigna's Structural Conflict Will Now Be Scrutinized
Court Denies Reliance Standard's Untimely Request For Medical Exam
Court Finds MetLife Arbitrary and Capricious in its Denial of LTD Benefits
Diaz finally gets his day in court against Prudential
Disability Carriers Must Pay the Price for Their Arrogance in Denying Benefits
Disability Insurer Repeatedly Refuses to Pay for Surgery, Breaks Settlement Agreements, and Postpones Treatment Causing Claimant Anxiety Resulting in $1.5M Verdict
Disability Insurers Must Now Feel Your Pain
Disability Plan Documents With Inconsistent Definitions of "Disability" Will be Construed in Favor of the Employee
Disability carriers must provide for a full and fair review including the four cornerstones of Reason, Reference, Description, and Explanation, pursuant to ERISA.
Disability claims-handling systems put profit before disability benefits
Disabling pain?
District Court Shares The "Love" With Our Disabled Client
Employees Cannot be Fired Because of Expensive Medical Insurance Claims
Evidence of Disability Found in Bedrock of Social Security Disability Determination
Evidence suggesting a mistake in diagnosis, lack of detail, and unexplained contradictions are not fatal to LTD claim
Exploring work options with the Department of Vocational Rehabilitation
First Unum ordered to pay claimant's attorney fees and interest due to "culpability."
How are attorney fees and expenses paid in a long-term disability benefit claim?
How long before I receive benefits?
How much can I earn while collecting worker?s compensation?
How to Prove your Disability to the Insurance Company
How to penetrate the LTD carrier's administrative record for evidence of its incompetence and bad faith.
Insurance Company May Allow Extra Time For New Medical Evidence
Insurer's Cancellation of Health Coverage After Cancer Diagnosis Results in $9M Award
Insurer's Recovery From Claimant of Benefit Overpayments May be Barred
LTD Carrier That Exceeds 45 Day Review Period is Held to Stricter Standard
LTD carrier's failure to produce the entire administrative record may result in a ruling favorable to the claimant.
Liberty Mutual unlawfully failed to consider and discuss evidence of claimant's long-term disability
Long-Term Disability Standard Stricter After 24 Months
Many people who apply for Social Security Disability also apply for Long-Term Disability benefits through a private insurer
Met Life's Decision Denying LTD Benefits Found Arbitrary and Capricious
Met-Life ?Abused Its Discretion? Where Denial of LTD Benefits ?Lacks Rational Connection?
MetLife Denied Claimant Full and Fair Review
MetLife found to have undisputed structural conflict of interest
NFL Retirement plan refuses to pay disability to former football player in violation of ERISA.
Ninth Circuit Finds MetLife Abused its Discretion in Terminating Long-Term Disability Benefits
No Cost-of-Living Adjustment for Social Security Benefits
No matter what your disability, the most important element of an application for SSDI/SSI is medical records and reports
People Denied Long-Term Disability Benefits Need Make-Whole Remedies
Prudential will now be confronted at trial with evidence of our client's disability
Prudential's doctors now subject to scrutiny
Remember To Use SOAP To Prove Your LTD Claim
Replacing the DOT
SSDI: Subsidy or Wages
Social Security vs. Alzheimer's: The race against time
Stimulus for the disabled
Substantial Gainful Employment
Sufferers of CFS or Fibromyalgia Cannot Be Denied Their Long-Term Disability Benefits by an Insurer Without a Specialist
The Hartford violated ERISA by Failing to Identify Alternative Jobs For Claimant
The Social Security process is a long and frustrating one; one that can take years before benefits are awarded
The effect of past work
Two types of disability programs through the Social Security Administration
U.S. Supreme Court Affirms That MetLife's Conflict of Interest And Employee's SSD Award Supported Reversal of MetLife's Denial of LTD Benefits
UNUM Likes To Hide Its Sins
UNUM consents to $15,000,000 fine and process to correct denied claims back to 1997
UNUM held "arbitrary and capricious" for ignoring claimant's subjective evidence of her pain and the opinions of her treating doctors
Vocational Hypotheticals during a Social Security hearing must only account for limitations accepted as credible
What are my chances of being approved?
What does it mean to be disabled under the Social Security Administration?
What's it worth? The two most prominent questions asked regarding Social Security.
When must I file suit against my insurer for denial of my long-term disability benefits?
XMRV Virus linked to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome May Help LTD Benefit Recovery
You Need To Get The Goods Before You Get The Benefits



Archives

July, 2009



The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.