Alan C. Olson & Associates, s.c. A Team of Employment Law Experts
WEBLOG

Home
Attorneys
Contact Us
Site Map


Subscribe
RSS 2.0 feed
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to Bloglines
Add to your My Feedster
Add to your NewsGator
My MSN
What is RSS?

Bad Faith Denial of Long-Term Disability Claim Warrants Award for Emotional Distress, Loss of Reputation, Economic Injury, Punitive Damages, and Attorney Fees

Bad Faith Denial of Long-Term Disability Claim Warrants Award for Emotional Distress, Loss of Reputation, Economic Injury, Punitive Damages, and Attorney Fees
Posted by: Alan Olson
January 31, 2007

Bad Faith Denial of Long-Term Disability Claim Warrants Award for Emotional Distress, Loss of Reputation, Economic Injury, Punitive Damages, and Attorney Fees

Long-Term Disability policies that are provided to employees by private employers are normally enforceable in federal court under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).  However, ERISA does not apply to long term disability plans that are provided to employees who work for the government, such as school districts, municipalities, state and federal agencies.  Government plans must therefore be enforced under state common law. 

It is well-settled by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin that if an insurer fails to deal in good faith with its policyholder by refusing, without proper cause, to compensate for a loss covered by the policy, such conduct may give rise to a cause of action for bad faith.  By virtue of the relationship between the parties created by a long term disability insurance contract, a special duty arises.  The act of bad faith is a separate intentional wrong, which results from a breach of duty imposed as a consequence of the relationship established by contract.  When such a breach occurs, the insurance company is liable for any damages which are the proximate result of that breach.

To establish a claim for bad faith, the disabled person must show the absence of a reasonable basis for denying benefits of the policy and the insurance company's knowledge or reckless disregard of the lack of a reasonable basis for denying the claim.  The policyholder must establish that, under the facts and circumstances, a reasonable insurer could not have denied or delayed payment of the claim.  In other words, the Court measures the insurer's conduct against what a reasonable insurer would have done under the particular facts and circumstances.

The legal claim of bad faith was created to protect the policyholder.  Its primary purpose is to redress all economic harm proximately caused by an insurer's bad faith.  Permitting the aggrieved policyholder to obtain extracontractual damages, the bad faith action is in the forefront of consumer protection litigation.  Policyholders who prove that their long-term disability insurers acted in bad faith may recover damages for emotional distress, loss of reputation, and economic injury. 

The Supreme Court of Wisconsin recognizes that an insurance company has a special "fiduciary" relationship to its insured which derives from the great disparity in bargaining positions of the parties.  It is this fiduciary relationship that is the key element justifying the use of compensatory remedies for the insurer's breach of the contractual obligation. 

Under the well-established American Rule, parties to litigation are generally responsible for their own attorney's fees unless recovery is expressly allowed by either contract or statute.  However, when an insurer acts in bad faith by denying long term disability benefits, it is liable to the insured for any damages which are the proximate result of that conduct.  Accordingly, when the insurer's bad faith forced the disabled policyholder to retain an attorney to obtain the benefits, those expenses are recoverable.

Finally, punitive damages can be imposed against an insurer who denies its disabled policyholder’s claim in bad faith.  Punitive damages are designed to punish and deter the insurance company from engaging in unlawful conduct now and in the future.  Such an award is based upon the egregiousness of the insurance company’s conduct, its wealth, and the amount of money it would take to change the insurer’s behavior.

Alan Olson


Alan C. Olson practices employment law in New Berlin, Wisconsin.          AOlson@Employee-Advocates.com

Permalink

        

Topics

A disability insurance carrier's use of the same case manager to deny each internal appeal violates the claimant's right to a full and fair review.
Bad Faith Denial of Long-Term Disability Claim Warrants Award for Emotional Distress, Loss of Reputation, Economic Injury, Punitive Damages, and Attorney Fees
Court Denies Reliance Standard?s Untimely Request For Medical Exam
Court Finds MetLife Arbitrary and Capricious in its Denial of LTD Benefits
Diaz finally gets his day in court against Prudential
Disability Carriers Must Pay the Price for Their Arrogance in Denying Benefits
Disability Insurer Repeatedly Refuses to Pay for Surgery, Breaks Settlement Agreements, and Postpones Treatment Causing Claimant Anxiety Resulting in $1.5M Verdict
Disability Insurers Must Now Feel Your Pain
Disability Plan Documents With Inconsistent Definitions of "Disability" Will be Construed in Favor of the Employee
Disability carriers must provide for a full and fair review including the four cornerstones of Reason, Reference, Description, and Explanation, pursuant to ERISA.
Disability claims-handling systems put profit before disability benefits
Employees Cannot be Fired Because of Expensive Medical Insurance Claims
Evidence of Disability Found in Bedrock of Social Security Disability Determination
Evidence suggesting a mistake in diagnosis, lack of detail, and unexplained contradictions are not fatal to LTD claim
How long before I receive benefits?
How to Prove your Disability to the Insurance Company
How to penetrate the LTD carrier's administrative record for evidence of its incompetence and bad faith.
Insurance Company May Allow Extra Time For New Medical Evidence
Insurer's Cancellation of Health Coverage After Cancer Diagnosis Results in $9M Award
LTD Carrier That Exceeds 45 Day Review Period is Held to Stricter Standard
LTD carrier's failure to produce the entire administrative record may result in a ruling favorable to the claimant.
Long-Term Disability Standard Stricter After 24 Months
Many people who apply for Social Security Disability also apply for Long-Term Disability benefits through a private insurer
NFL Retirement plan refuses to pay disability to former football player in violation of ERISA.
People Denied Long-Term Disability Benefits Need Make-Whole Remedies
Remember To Use SOAP To Prove Your LTD Claim
Sufferers of CFS or Fibromyalgia Cannot Be Denied Their Long-Term Disability Benefits by an Insurer Without a Specialist
U.S. Supreme Court Affirms That MetLife?s Conflict of Interest And Employee?s SSD Award Supported Reversal of MetLife?s Denial of LTD Benefits
UNUM consents to $15,000,000 fine and process to correct denied claims back to 1997
UNUM held ?arbitrary and capricious? for ignoring claimant?s subjective evidence of her pain and the opinions of her treating doctors
What does it mean to be disabled under the Social Security Administration?
What is it worth? The two most prominent questions asked regarding Social Security.



Archives

January, 2007


Web Resources

WEBLOG
FindLaw
Thomson West
U.S. Courts
Westlaw
United States Chamber of Commerce
FirstGov
Legislative Branch
Library of Congress
White House
Internal Revenue Service
National Weather Service
Yahoo!Maps
YellowPages.com
New York Times
Newspapers Online
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
AOL
Google
Yahoo!Legal Blog Directory  


The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

Copyright © 2008Alan C. Olson & Associates, s.c. A Team of Employment Law Experts. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.